In this review
A friend sat across from me at dinner, leaned forward under a warm pendant light, and asked if I had gotten extensions. I had not. I had been using the Maybelline Sky High washable mascara for about five weeks at that point, two coats on bare lashes, nothing else on the eye. I told her the name of the tube. She pulled out her phone and ordered it before the appetizers came.
That is the Sky High effect in a sentence. It is also the trap. Because what she noticed from across a table was length, and length is this mascara’s one real trick. If she had wanted volume, she would have ordered the wrong thing.
Maybelline Lash Sensational Sky High Washable Mascara
Maybelline’s fiber-loaded washable formula with the bendy Flex Tower wand. 0.24 fl oz tube, bamboo extract and rayon fibers, warm-water removal. Goes viral on TikTok every eighteen months and still costs under fifteen dollars at any drugstore.
Rating breakdown
Testing Context
Combination skin, oily lids that start showing shine around the four-hour mark, lashes that are naturally decent length but thin and straight. I live somewhere that swings between radiator-dry winter and humid summer, so I tested across both. Daily routine on the eye area was a lightweight eye cream, occasionally a cream shadow as a base, and this mascara on bare lashes with no primer. I wanted to see what the formula was actually doing, not what it was doing on top of a setup.
Six weeks of near-daily wear. One tube. A mix of desk days under office fluorescents, two flights, a humid outdoor wedding, and a handful of longer days that ran past the twelve-hour mark.
The Flex Tower Wand Is the Whole Product
The formula matters, but the wand is what makes or breaks this one. It is a standard-length plastic brush on a thin bendable stem, and it flexes noticeably when you press it against the lash line. That floppy quality is polarizing. On TikTok people either say it changed their life or they hate it.
I fell on the love side after two days of adjustment. The bend lets you hook the bristles under the lash root and drag upward, which is how you get the length claim to do anything. A rigid wand cannot do this. You have to learn to use the flex, though, or you will end up with product on your lid crease. Pressing too hard is the main rookie error, and I did it for the first three applications.
For the outer corners, where my lashes point sideways toward my temples, the flex wand fans them out in a single sweep. For the inner corners, the bristle density catches the tiny hairs most wands skip. Where it struggles is bottom lashes. The wand is too long and too bendy to deposit a controlled dot on the short bottom row, and on more than one morning I ended up with mascara on my under-eye concealer. If you do heavy bottom-lash application, this is not your wand.
Length Is Real. Volume Is Marketing.
The brand makes five claims about this formula in its marketing copy. There is volume, there is length, and then there is definition plus curl plus some kind of multiplying effect. Here is which of those actually hold up after six weeks on my face.
Lengthening is real. The rayon fibers visibly extend each lash, and two coats gets my natural lashes to what looks like a subtle false-lash result. A third coat is where most people tip into clumping, and I found that too. Two is the sweet spot.
Defining and multiplying are also real, which are polite ways of saying the wand separates lashes well and the formula does not clump until you over-apply.
Volumizing is a stretch. This mascara does not thicken lashes in a meaningful way. If your lashes are already dense, two coats looks dramatic. If your lashes are sparse, you will get length without the fullness you probably actually want. I have a friend with thin lashes who came back from testing it for a week saying it made her look like a spider had crawled across her lid, all length, no body. That is a fair critique. She switched back to a Lancôme Hypnôse and was happier.
Curling is the weakest claim of the five. There is no appreciable curl hold here. If your lashes are straight like mine, you still need a lash curler before application or the length drags them down. I learned this on day two and curled from day three on.
Where the Fibers Go at Hour Eight
The real weakness of Sky High, and the complaint I see consistently in honest reviews, is flaking past the seven-hour mark. The fibers that give you length are also what fall. I wore this to a long shoot day that ran about eleven hours, and by the drive home I had black specks on my cheekbones and one under my right eye. Not catastrophic. Noticeable in a lit bathroom mirror.
A few conditions made it worse. Adding a touch-up coat in the afternoon tipped it into much flakier territory, which matches what I saw echoed in reviewer after reviewer. The second coat applied over a first coat that has already set does not play well. I stopped doing touch-ups by week three and accepted that this is a one-application mascara.
On my oily lids, I also got some transfer to the crease by hour eight, a faint grey smudge that looked like a shadow if you were not looking carefully. Not the same thing as a bad raccoon-eye smudge, but worth flagging if your lids are oilier than mine or if you live somewhere more humid than I do. The waterproof version of Sky High is a separate product with a different formula and, by most accounts, a much worse removal experience, so I am not going to pretend the waterproof fixes this.
Ingredients and What Actually Matters
The bamboo extract in the formula is a marketing line. It is listed as Bambusa Vulgaris extract and it is doing very little at the concentration it sits at. The component that actually matters for performance is the rayon fibers, which are the long-lash mechanism, plus the beeswax and the film-forming polymers that hold the fibers in place. This is a fiber mascara wearing a natural-ingredient costume.
The formula is allergy tested and ophthalmologist tested. Sensitive eyes and contact lens wearers seem to tolerate it, which tracks with six weeks of my own wear with zero irritation. Worth noting that Maybelline is not cruelty-free because L’Oréal, the parent, sells in mainland China. If cruelty-free is a non-negotiable for you, this is a skip regardless of performance.
Removal
Warm water, a couple of minutes of pressure with fingertips, done. No oil cleanser strictly required. The fibers come off in little grey tubes, which is a mildly alarming visual the first time you see it, and a visual that also explains exactly why fibers flake onto your cheekbones. The removal is where the washable version earns its keep. I would happily trade a small amount of mid-day smudging for the fact that I can take this off without attacking my lash line.
Who This Is For, and Who Should Skip It
Buy Sky High if you have naturally decent length you want to push further, if you have ever been complimented on your lashes and want that effect daily, if you want a mascara that photographs well, and if you can live with a possible spec or two on your cheekbone at the end of a long day. Buy it if you rotate between drugstore and luxury and want a sub-fifteen-dollar option that genuinely competes with Lancôme Lash Idôle and Benefit They’re Real.
Skip it if you are shopping for volume. You will be disappointed, and you will blame the product for not being something it never claimed to be in honest terms. Skip it if your lashes are sparse and you want them to look fuller, not just longer. Skip it if you have oily lids and you need a set-it-and-forget-it mascara for a hot outdoor day. Skip the waterproof version unless you love your oil cleanser.
The Flex Tower wand is the thing you are actually paying for. If you try it and hate how floppy it feels in your hand, returning it is a reasonable call, and no amount of technique will fix a preference.
Sky High deserves its shelf space. Not because it does everything the marketing says. Because it does one thing, lengthening lashes with a fiber formula and a flexible wand, better than almost anything near its price. Just know which thing you are buying.
For more reviews of beauty products that cut through marketing hype, browse our complete beauty category.
Also featured in
Related reviews
Best Affordable Skincare Under $30: The Bathroom Counter Edit That Actually Works
The glycolic toner that faded a post-acne mark by week three, the $4.75 mask that gives glass skin, and the asterisks on the jar.
The Glam Apr 18 
BIODANCE Bio-Collagen Real Deep Mask Review: Glass Skin or Glorified Sheet
Eight weeks, one mask a week, half in the fridge. The glass-skin claim holds for thirty-six hours. The slippage is real.
The Glam Apr 15 
Medicube Zero Pore Pad 2.0 Review: Six Weeks on Combination Skin
Six weeks of testing the dual-textured K-beauty exfoliating pad on combination skin. Pore results are real. The alcohol in the formula is also real.
The Glam Apr 15 
Mighty Patch Original Review: The Sticker That Earns Its Shelf Space
Six weeks of patching every whitehead. Average flatten: seven hours. Here's what these hydrocolloid dots actually do.
The Glam Apr 15 
Neutrogena Makeup Remover Wipes Review: The Drugstore Staple, Tested Honestly
Six weeks of nightly Neutrogena wipes. They clear 90% of waterproof mascara beautifully—then leave a film you'll want to rinse.
The Glam Apr 15 
eos Shea Better Vanilla Cashmere Body Lotion Review
A woman in line asked what perfume I was wearing. I wasn't wearing any—just this $6 body lotion, eight hours after application.
The Glam Apr 15